Skip to content
InsidrMet™

Receipts, not rumors.

Real sources live here, separate from the fictional roster. Profiles are invented; these links are not. We summarise; read the originals.

Guidance

Guidanceprimary-source

Insider Threat Mitigation Guide

CISA

CISA's mitigation model combines organizational, personnel, physical and information security; risk assessment uses observable behavior and context.

Published
unknown — see source
Checked (curator)
not checked by live feed (bundled)

Guidanceprimary-source

Common Sense Guide to Mitigating Insider Threats, Seventh Edition

Carnegie Mellon SEI / CERT

The 2022 guide describes 22 practices informed by analysis of more than 3,000 cases, including coordinated enterprise controls such as separation of duties, least privilege and deprovisioning.

Published
2022
Checked (curator)
not checked by live feed (bundled)

Guidanceprimary-source

Scattered Spider (AA23-320A)

CISA & FBI

Joint advisory describing impersonation of staff and help desks, MFA fatigue and reset abuse. External impersonation must not be mislabelled as proven malicious insider behaviour.

Published
unknown — see source
Checked (curator)
not checked by live feed (bundled)

Guidanceprimary-source

Insider risk management policy templates

Microsoft Learn

Templates contextualise data movement near departure dates and support HR-driven signals; alerts require review rather than automatic conclusions.

Published
unknown — see source
Checked (curator)
not checked by live feed (bundled)

Guidanceprimary-source

Insider risk management: privacy by design

Microsoft Learn

Pseudonymisation is on by default for specific analyst and investigator roles, supporting privacy during review. Risk signals are not verdicts.

Published
unknown — see source
Checked (curator)
not checked by live feed (bundled)

Guidance

Valid Accounts — T1078

MITRE ATT&CK

Published
unknown — see source
Checked (curator)
not checked by live feed (bundled)

Incident

Incidentprimary-source

Protecting our customers — standing up to extortionists

Coinbase (primary disclosure)

Coinbase reported criminals bribing overseas support personnel to obtain customer data for later social engineering. Its disclosure distinguishes exposed data from passwords, private keys and access to funds.

Published
unknown — see source
Checked (curator)
not checked by live feed (bundled)

Incidentprimary-source

How a North Korean fake IT worker tried to infiltrate us

KnowBe4 (primary disclosure)

A hire using a stolen identity and altered photo was detected and contained by endpoint controls and restricted onboarding access. KnowBe4 explicitly said no data was lost or exfiltrated — this was not a successful breach.

Published
unknown — see source
Checked (curator)
not checked by live feed (bundled)

Incidentdeveloping-attributed-reporting

Tether, Circle freeze $238 billion after Binance reports security incident

Reuters

Developing reporting of a roughly $6.3B theft disclosed 29 Oct 2026. Preliminary company statements cite a compromised engineer laptop; later reporting mentions additional breach points. Compromised infrastructure is not evidence of a malicious employee.

Developing and attributed — not independently verified. Compromised infrastructure is not evidence of employee intent.

Published
2026-10-29
Checked (curator)
not checked by live feed (bundled)

Incidentdeveloping-attributed-analysis

TRM Labs: analysis of the 29 October Binance incident

TRM Labs

TRM assesses hot-wallet signing-infrastructure compromise from transaction evidence and attributes it to TraderTraitor with high confidence. Root cause was not yet publicly established. An attributed assessment, not a finding about any employee.

Developing and attributed — not independently verified. Compromised infrastructure is not evidence of employee intent.

Published
unknown — see source
Checked (curator)
not checked by live feed (bundled)

Culture · anecdote, not evidence

Culture · anecdote, not evidencecultural-reference-not-evidence

“Torment Nexus” post

Alex Blechman (original post)

The product premise in one joke: institutions reading a cautionary tale as a spec. Linked and credited; InsidrMet copy is original.

Culture, not evidence. Linked and credited; nothing reproduced.

Published
unknown — see source
Checked (curator)
not checked by live feed (bundled)

Culture · anecdote, not evidencecultural-reference-not-evidence

xkcd #538: Security

Randall Munroe / xkcd

Expensive technical assurance vs human exposure. Linked only, not reproduced.

Culture, not evidence. Linked and credited; nothing reproduced.

Published
unknown — see source
Checked (curator)
not checked by live feed (bundled)

Culture · anecdote, not evidencecultural-reference-not-evidence

On Fire (Gunshow #648, “This Is Fine”)

K.C. Green / Gunshow

Institutional normalisation of obvious warnings. Original artwork credited and linked; we don't reuse it.

Culture, not evidence. Linked and credited; nothing reproduced.

Published
unknown — see source
Checked (curator)
not checked by live feed (bundled)

Culture · anecdote, not evidencediscussion-excerpt-only

r/sysadmin: How are you detecting internal threats?

r/sysadmin community

Public discussion of admins being both defenders and privileged risk. Only a search excerpt was reviewed (full retrieval blocked). Discussion, not corroboration; not quoted.

Culture, not evidence. Linked and credited; nothing reproduced.

Published
unknown — see source
Checked (curator)
not checked by live feed (bundled)

ByPants note

The ByPants Exchange scenario is a generic, synthetic signing-infrastructure exercise with an original trousers brand. It is prompted by developing reporting (Reuters, TRM Labs — listed above as incident sources) on a real exchange incident. Those are attributed, developing assessments: compromised infrastructure or a compromised device is not evidence that any employee acted maliciously. We publish no counts of real staff or pre-disclosure figures. A signature tells you which key. It does not tell you whose hands.

Checking roster… · 50 fictional profiles